The Wrestler (2008)

* * * * *

The Jist
The Wrestler chronicles Randy "The Ram" Robinson, a former champion wrestler, as he struggles with the reality of his career coming to a close. The battles he faces outside the ring weigh heavier than those in the squared-circle as he tries to mend broken relationships and make ends meet.

What's Good
It seems that redemption stories come and go in Hollywood week after week, but with his debut screenplay, Robert D. Siegel makes the unlikely choice of framing the redemption theme around the world of professional wrestling in the most creative screenplay of the year. Simply put, The Wrestler is a great story; great characters working through difficult situations that are unique but always understandable, and most importantly, real. The script contains so much attention to detail, both in terms of recreating the world of wrestling and the image of a flawed man. Siegel's creation of Randy "The Ram" will surely go down as his best character. The Ram is perfectly rounded, a flawed man and father, but a good friend, worker, and mentor. We see his nearly countless failures, but also just enough of his sense of humor and passion to make him an incredibly sympathetic character. With a story like this its nearly impossible to avoid cliche, but The Wrestler goes through them so honestly and brutally without over-dramatizing events that even when the audience sees something coming, it still reverberates with true intensity. Characters like Randy's daughter Stephanie, played by Evan Rachel Wood, seem destined to fall into mediocrity, but the script allows Wood to deliver a believable performance as a neglected child with a grudge without going over the top. Todd Barry's character Wayne, Randy's non-wrestling employer, personifies the indifference of the outside world, and his un-sentimental and restrained performance fuels Mickey Rourke's tour de force. The cast of bit parts played both by actors and real amateur wrestlers create a window into the wrestling community, and shows that the characters on screen and in the ring are real people with real problems.

What's Bad
Despite the Wrestler's strong plot, the dialogue, at times, is a bit dull. Some will find the writing to be honest without trying to glamorize the characters and situations, but others may get bored with the trudging conversations. A few of the situations begin to get repetitive, such as Randy's continual trips to the strip club, but none of the film's flaws take away from its brilliant direction and acting.

What's Memorable
Mickey Rourke's performance has been sensationalized beyond belief, and the idea of his life intersecting with art in the form of the title character will forever be associated with the film. But when true genius is exhibited, due praise is deserved, and there are few performances more deserving than the devastating, soul-bearing portrayal of Randy "The Ram" by Rourke. Rourke has created one of the most enduring characters in film history, a modern day Terry Malloy, inspired by all of the great down-and-out characters that have come before him. Watching Randy, the once great superstar of the ring, lower himself to community center events in small towns just to scrape together enough money to pay his trailer rent, all while trying to rekindle the relationship he never had with his daughter, reeks of pain and suffering, but we can't take our eyes off the screen because of Rourke. Randy "The Ram" is real, someone we've watched on Pay-Per-View, read about in the papers, and seen behind the deli counter, and Rourke totally becomes him. The performance is flawless; beyond intimate and inspiring, both beautiful in its subtlety and crushing in its honesty. The Wrestler is Mickey Rourke, but don't forget about Marisa Tomei. The role of Cassidy, a stripper and friend of Randy, was demanding physically and mentally, and Tomei brings a delicacy that softens the blow of Randy's failures. She complements Rourke's amazing performance without ever overshadowing it, half because of Rourke's overriding greatness and half because of Tomei's calculated acting. Lost in the Rourke hysteria, however, has been Darren Aronofsky. Known for his powerful, boundary-pushing films like Requiem for a Dream and the Fountain, The Wrestler is his most traditional and focused work to date. Whereas in the past Aronofsky's ambitions may have outweighed his decision making, The Wrestler shows him at his most constrained, which happens to coincide with his creative pinnacle. The film is great in its efficiency, not wasting one of the 110 minutes and not needing a single frame more to deliver the punch. The plot moves slowly, but at an appropriate pace for the sequence of events, and despite its dark overtones, the film has just enough style. The sound editing and handheld camera work give the situations authenticity, and the editing is spot-on, particularly the phenomenal conclusion. The Wrestler is the fusion of stunning acting and great directing, and a triumphant document of human failure and redemption from the opening sequence illustrating "The Ram's" zenith, to the heart-wrenching final scene.

Good for: all movie-goers, fans of drama, wrestling fans, actors

Bad for: overly emotional movie-watchers, the easily bored

The Gallery
The Surfer: * * * * *
The Writer * * * *

Doubt (2008)

* * * * *

The Jist
Doubt is set in the 1960s, and centers around a nun (Meryl Streep) who suspects a priest (Philip Seymour Hoffman) of having a questionable relationship with a young male student at the Catholic school she oversees. A younger nun, played by Amy Adams, tries to maintain good will at the school while regarding the integrity of all parties involved in the questionable affairs.

What's Good
John Patrick Shanley has already received a Pulitzer Prize and Tony Award for the theatrical version of Doubt, and who better to enlist to ensure a strong big-screen adaptation than Streep and Hoffman in the lead roles. A great script draws great actors, and the casting was excellent. Streep is one of the best actresses of all-time, Hoffman may be the greatest character actor of his generation, and Amy Adams is a legitimate up and coming actress about to become a major figure. Not all plays work as films, but Shanley's efficient direction shows that he has a wide variety of talents beyond just writing. There are limited settings, as one would expect from a theatrical adaptation, but the dark cathedrals, ancient Catholic school classrooms, and quiet rectories work well on the big screen, providing just the right atmosphere for the characters to thrive in. The story moves at just the right pace, slow but steady, and from the opening frame to the credits the tension builds to a thought-provoking climax.

What's Bad
The script drives Doubt, and while most will be mesmerized by the dialogue, some may be bored by the lack of action. Along the same lines, Doubt feels like a play; so those bored with the dialogue will also grow tired of the repetitive scenery and long scenes. There are signs that Shanley is a first time director, but some of the questionable decisions in terms of plot and subtext were risks most first time directors wouldn't take. Overall, there isn't much wrong with this film.

What You'll Remember
As one would expect, the acting is phenomenal. Hoffman and Streep steal the show, and their scenes together are electric. Streep is a lightning rod and plays Sister Aloysius with a fervent intensity that will call to mind childhood memories for anyone who grew up in a Catholic school. Hoffman plays Father Flynn so sharply that no one knows whether he is a good-intentioned progressive priest or a deceiving fake, but just like the kids in his class, the audience will want him to come back for time and again. Amy Adams, a subordinate both in character and in practice to Hoffman and Streep, is great as Sister James. The part demanded both tender passivity and stark veracity, and although Streep and Hoffman's characters draw most of the attention, Adam's Sister Flynn is who the audience will relate to. The only other character with a significant role is Viola Davis as Ms. Miller, the mother of the boy in question with Father Flynn. Davis is only on-screen for nearly ten minutes, but she is unforgettable as a mother at a crossroads. A look at the awards this script has already won tells you all you need to know about it, but Shanley's writing propels the great performances, presents a thrilling plot, and is one of the most thought-proving films of the year. Amidst the mystery surrounding Father Flynn are overarching themes of faith, religion, and morality, and there are many questions left unanswered. The ambiguous nature of these fickle issues mirrors the way they are addressed in reality, and Doubt will likely tell the viewer just as much about him/herself as it does about the characters on the screen. In the end, Doubt brings so much to the table; it's a cautionary tale, a fable, and an ethical dilemma, all with driving intensity both in plot and in performance. It is the rare suspense film that asks hard questions, leaving the viewer to ponder them after the brilliant conclusion.

Good for: theater fans, actors, fans of sharp dialogue, suspense fans, philosphers

Bad for: the easily bored, someone not looking to think in the theater

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008)

* * * *

The Jist
Adapted from an F. Scott Fitzgerald short story, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is the story of a boy born old, who from the time of his birth ages backwards from an elderly man to a young infant. His life is full of unexpected events, as he encounters people and situations from a unique perspective.

What's Good
David Fincher's mid-late nineties stretch of great films is ten years behind him, but with Benjamin Button, the man who adapted the mind-trap that was Fight Club has showed that he can also adapt an emotional, heart-wrenching tale. Benjamin Button is an epic in terms of length and vision, and with the help of veteran screenwriter Eric Roth, Fincher has created an enduring and enjoyable fable. Having the likes of Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett as leads surely helps, and both deliver the performances audiences have come to expect. Pitt steps up to plate for the demanding role and plays the title character from old age to prepubescence with nuance and affection. Blanchett once again reminds us she is the best actress of her time by bringing much more to the role than the what was written on the page. Taraji P. Henson, as Benjamin's adoptive mother, steps into the limelight with an intimate, motherly performance well beyond her actual age in years and wisdom. The strength of Benjamin Button lies in the story, however, which is well crafted by Roth and will appeal to a broad audience.

What's Not
The most obvious fault of Benjamin Button is its length. Roth and Fincher popped off the delete key to take Fitzgerald's short story and turn it into a nearly three hour long epic. Its hard to say which scenes shouldn't have made the final cut, but its clear that the story wouldn't have lost too much with about thirty minutes less material. Comparisons have been made to Roth's past screenplay, Forrest Gump, and the similarities are legitimate. Substitute a mentally challenged lead with a reverse-aging man, and most of the themes and even circumstances are very similar. Although the story is engaging, Fincher rounded off the sharp edges that can be found all over his past work. Chances were taken from a technical aspect, but thematically and artistically, Benjamin Button is pretty conservative and looks like a safely made film meant to make some money.

What You'll Remember
Movie-goers have become accustomed to outrageous special effects, but the costume and design team for Benjamin Button pulled off one the most unique and challenging tasks in a non-action film to date. Thanks to incredible prostheses and costume design, the star-power of Brad Pitt fades away into a geriatric man, and a mere two hours later, Pitt, who is in his 40s, looks not a day older than 16. The combination of Pitt's believable performance and the stunning make-up job make Benjamin Button a very memorable character. The best part of the film, though, is the source material. Fitzgerald's fable, even if extended hundreds of pages beyond the original, will resonate with nearly everyone, and the idea of celebrating life rather than destroying it is one not often found in popular cinema. Even if Fincher and Roth played it close to the belt, the story and moral behind Benjamin Button is one most viewers won't soon forget.

Good for: the average movie fan, Pitt fans, someone down on their luck

Bad for: people who don't like long films, people who cry at movies

The Gallery
The Surfer: * * *

Rachel Getting Married (2008)

* * *

The Jist
Rachel Getting Married is not so much the story of Rachel, but the story of her drug and tragedy addled sister Kym, played by Anne Hathaway. Kym is home from rehab for the first time in years for her sister's wedding and confronts her past mistakes as she tries to recapture a sense of normal life. The nature of coping, forgiveness, and the structure of family relationships are explored as a dysfunctional family is reunited for a weekend.

What's Good
Directed by Jonathan Demme, best known for Silence of the Lambs, Rachel Getting Married may be the most honest film of the year. The events of a weekend wedding, from rehearsal dinner to reception, aren't sugar coated or dramatized whatsoever, but presented as they really occur, for better or worse. The "take it as it is" approach Demme utilizes allows his cast to disappear into their characters which yields several solid performances. Bill Irwin, as Kym's dad Paul, turns in a strong performance as a not so in-touch father always trying to look at the bright side of things, and Tunde Adebimpe (of TV on the Radio) is surprisingly good among veteran actors as Rachel's husband-to-be. The script, by debut screenwriter Jenny Lumet, is blunt and dark but also has a few light-hearted moments, just like the dysfunctional family it involves. The situations are real and believable, and the direction, script, and performances allow the viewer to feel as if they are within the scenes.

What's Not so Good
At times, Demme's "home video" filming style leads to scene's dragging on way beyond their welcome, at times minutes longer than the audience would expect or desire. The rehearsal dinner, which has its share of crucial moments for the film, feels like literally the entire rehearsal dinner. And just like the real thing, where the toast speeches start to run dry after the second or third one, the stories begin to grow old fast and by the time Kym delivers her powerful speech, it has been tainted by all the unnecessary footage that came before it. Almost every main scene drags on as the camera continues to follow the action well beyond what would be necessary to advance the plot in order to deliver the "window into reality" perspective. The film easily could have been 15-20 minutes shorter, and would have been a much tighter, more fierce portrayal of the weekend, even if some of the intimacy of the moment was lost.

What You'll Remember
This film is Anne Hathaway's announcement to the world that she is the real deal. She was a major figure in Brokeback Mountain, but until now, Hathaway was just the girl from Princess Diaries. But with this performance as Kym, likely the best of the year by any actress, she has proven that she can bring depth and range to a role. Kym is high strung but burnt out, desperate to change but stuck in a rut, apologetic but bitter, hopeful but defeated, and Hathaway delivers the full spectrum with great intensity in nearly every scene. Her performance is up against the odds of tedium, but a great role and a solid supporting cast provide the perfect recipe for her career-best effort.

Good for: fans of dysfunctional family films, Hathaway fans, filmmakers, addicts

Bad for: people who sleep through movies

The Gallery
The Surfer: * * * *

Man on Wire (2008)

* * * *

Is it possible to make an entire documentary out of a tightrope walk that spanned less than one hour over thirty years ago? James Marsh says yes, and has made the best documentary of the year, the enthralling Man on Wire. In 1974 Philippe Petit and two friends secretly made his way to the top of the World Trade Center, suspended a rope between the two buildings. Petit walked, danced, and laid upon the rope for 45 minutes. Floating in the clouds a quarter of a mile above the streets of New York City, Petit completed his life dream, came down, was arrested, released, and returned to France. Man on Wire captures the remarkable images of a man balancing his life within millimeters on the most unlikely stage. Petit's act has been called a criminal stunt, the act of a madman, and an image of profound beauty. The documentary explores how this fascinating dream came to be, what motivated it all to happen, and how the act was planned and executed over a span of months. Starting in a dental office, Petit realized his dream of completing the biggest tightrope walking challenge in the world, and he began his steps toward realizing it. His story is told both through actual footage, past interviews, and new interviews of Petit and his friends made for the film. Most of the film is in English, but some of the interviewees speak only French which is subtitled. Petit's uncanny passion and perspective on life drive the film, and the true story becomes more of a thriller than a documentary. The film chronicles his development as a tightrope walker, starting on a rope in a field and moving to buildings, bridges, and eventually the world's tallest buildings at the time, the World Trade Center. The years of planning, the emotional roller coaster of his crew, and their willingness to help their friend realize his dream are inspiring, and the build-up to the climactic walk will have everyone holding on to the edge of their seats. To Petit and his crew, the daring act was a heavenly ballet, the zenith of the human mind and body, and although few may feel see things this way before the film, the raw images of the act will convert many. Petit explains that accomplishing ones purpose in life is worth anything; what more glorious way to die than in the effort of achieving one's dream. This spirit carries Man on Wire to great heights, and the humanity of the effort and act are jaw-dropping and invigorating. A great story is only great if it is told the right way, and Marsh puts the pieces of this fabulous puzzle together just right.

Good for: all movie-goers, documentary fans, fans of thrillers

Bad for: people who don't like subtitles, the easily bored

The Gallery
The Film Maker: * * * *

Son of Rambow (2008)

* * *

Films with a primarily pre-pubescent cast are behind the eight-ball from the start. Toss in British humor and the remaining audience willing to watch such a film is sparse. But Son of Rambow is more than just a comedy for kids, its a tribute to youthful adventure and the spirit of creativity. The film stars Bill Milner as Will Proudfoot, a young boy raised in a overwhelmingly strict religious household in 1980s Britain. Will's mother keeps him in check both at home and at school, and his life of constant order has made him extremely shy and quiet. A bully in his grade, Lee Carter, played by Will Poulter, saves him from trouble one day by taking the blame in the principal's office. In return, Carter demands that Milner act and assist in creating his homemade full length feature "Son of Rambow." The situations and drama that ensue is a mixed bag of hearty laughs and predictable plot twists, all spiced with British dialogue and humor. Poulter and Milner, both in their acting debuts, deliver solid performances considering the circumstances, and the friend/foe chemistry between them drives the plot quite a ways. Director Garth Jennings guides the cast of mostly children into believable performances, and his witty script is both deadpan and satirical. Jennings love for film-making is apparent in the detailed references Lee Carter espouses in his quest to make a full-length movie. The story is cute and there is plenty to laugh at, but the final third of the movie devolves into typical children's movie conclusions most everyone has seen far too many times. The film is much more effective in highlighting artistic passion and exploration than familial relationships and decision making. The energy and playfulness of the film can only carry the story so far, however, before it becomes more of the same. Jennings has improved over his dreadful interpretation of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, but Son of Rambow still leaves something to be desired. Expect to see more of Poulter and Milner, however, as their onscreen tag-team is reminiscent of a young Simon Pegg and Nick Frost.

Good for: British comedy fans, parents with children, film-makers

Bad for: people who don't like kids, those who don't get British humor (humour)

Slumdog Millionaire (2008)

* * * *

Sometimes a film's premise can be so original and clever that the list of faults is overshadowed by a propulsive wave of storytelling toward a powerful, even if already predicted, conclusion. Slumdog Millionaire is just that film, the screen adaptation of an Indian novel (Q&A) directed by Indie film vet Danny Boyle. Boyle's most noted works, Trainspotting and 28 Days Later, are intense, dark, and gritty films, but in Slumdog, Boyle translates his intensity behind the camera into a story of hope and determination. Slumdog is centered around Jamal Malik, played masterfully by Dev Patel, and is set on location in India. Jamal is a contestant on the Indian version of "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?" and the film chronicles his life as he answers the questions up to the million dollar question. The hook is that his life experiences inexplicably prepare him to answer increasingly difficult questions despite his treacherous childhood and lack of education. The story is captivating and is one of the most original coming-of-age stories in quite some time, and the way the camera captures the Indian landscape, both desolate and majestic, is breathtaking. The cast is entirely unknown, but includes several great performances, particularly Patel's breakthrough. The story follows Jamal through three time periods, so each main character is portrayed by three different actors, and the child actors are incredible, performing unflinchingly in bizarre situations. Aside from Patel, the stunningly beautiful Freida Pinto stands out as the young-adult version of Jamal's childhood love interest Latika. Slumdog has a fair share of political and social commentary, and at times feels like a thriller, but is essentially a love story. Patel's performance as Jamal, in desperate search of love (Latika) and life (freedom), drives the film through both the good and bad scenes. The story is a breath of fresh air and the locations are original, but at times the film seems to drag. The two hour movie could have easily been 15-20 minutes shorter. Most of the situations seem plausible separately, but the order in which they occur, all to one individual, is beyond unlikely. The last ten minutes are so heartwarming that they overcome the fact that everyone knew exactly how they would happen for the previous ninety minutes. Slumdog is 75% english without subtitles and 25% subtitled. The subtitles are colored according to character, which is a simple but effective touch, but in a few select scenes the accents can make the spoken English difficult to understand. Despite the difficult circumstances Jamal encounters time and time again, the film maintains a strong theme of hope which burns bright in Patel's performance. A completely offbeat music video as the credits roll feels like a slap in the face after a thoughtful conclusion to an emotional film. However, the original framework within which the plot resides, the smart story, and the intimate feel of the direction and cinematography make Slumdog one of the most unique film experiences of the year.

Good for: foreign film fans, fans of romantic dramas

Bad for: the easily bored, those looking for a fluffy film

The Gallery
The Surfer: * * * *
The Writer * * * *

Religulous (2008)

* * * *

With no Michael Moore documentary (at least released in theaters) this year, and no other big name releasing a major film in the genre, Bill Maher of HBO's Real Time has stepped to the plate to tackle the issue of religion in his typical cynical, offensive, no-holds-barred style. Maher collaborates with director Larry Charles, of Borat and Seinfeld fame, to travel the world in search of mystery behind the nature of religion and faith. Those familiar with Maher already will know that he is a devout atheist and he does nothing to hide this throughout the film. This isn't an investigation into the good and bad of religion; this is Maher examining how religion has corrupted societies across the globe and contradicted its own foundations. Those who unflinchingly disagree with Maher may have trouble seeing through his rock solid bias, as his interviews involve half serious discussion of religion and half "are you serious?" mockery. His goal, however, seems to be more oriented toward opening up the conversation about the potential negative aspects of religion rather than driving home a distinct point like a Moore documentary. As the title suggests and the interviews reveal, there is a lot to be said about the irrationality behind some of the world's major religions. Religulous features shots at many of the world's most important "Holy Grounds" and contains interviews touching upon most of the major religions from leaders of those religions to average devotees like truck drivers. Although Maher always backs up his argument with factual information, he and Charles are comedians at heart and Religulous is the funniest religious movie you'll find on Netflix. There is no trickery here such as that which Charles' masterfully executed with Borat; microphones and cameras are intentionally shown on screen to make clear that all of the interview subjects were aware of the circumstances surrounding the film. Charles edits in many brief, seconds-long clips from the news, old movies, and old television shows between and during interviews that are often sarcastic, biting, and hilarious. Maher's deconstruction of religion from his own childhood and maturation reveal how those raised in faith may be attracted to new ideas. And in the long run, Maher's goal is simply that, to bring light to new ideas often trounced by political correctness or adherence to tradition. It's hard to find a large audience with a documentary, particularly one that openly mocks religion. But with Religulous, Maher has raised the dialogue about atheism and religious criticism from zero to something slightly above that without boring his audience and providing plenty of laughs with intellectual conversation.

Good for: Maher fans, open-minded thinkers

Bad for: the easily offended

Burn After Reading (2008)

* * * *

Leave it to the Coen brothers to follow up last year's best film, No Country for Old Men, with a film as quirky and off-the-wall as Burn After Reading. Ten years after the Big Lebowski followed their finest film, Fargo, the Coen's churn out another comedy with bizarre characters and situations, grim humor, and an outlandish premise. The Coens enlisted a star-studded cast including Brad Pitt, John Malkovich, Tilda Swinton, J.K. Simmons, Richard Jenkins and Coen-veterans Francis McDormand and George Clooney for their highly anticipated follow up. The story revolves around Chad (Pitt) and and Linda (McDormand) who stumble across a CD with government files that belongs to Malkovich's character Osbourne Cox, and attempt to use their discovery to get some cash out of Cox for Linda's plastic surgery. And that's only the half of it. The situations that arise are both outrageously funny and at times disturbingly sad. The dialogue is sharp and creates memorable characters, even in Coen brothers terms, especially Pitt's Chad which is easily the funniest performance of his career. All of the actors step into characters far from their typical roles and sell them completely. The film has definitive Coen style; quick and to the point with little waste. Like all of their films, Burn After Reading is full of cynical humor that points out flaws in society, and this film does so perhaps more than any of their others. The Coens are some of the only filmmakers who have the cojones to make a film like this to follow a Best Picture winner and to follow the ending of No Country for Old Men with the conclusion to this film. Some may be surprised or even disappointed with the obvious indulgence the brothers took in making such an eccentric film, but Burn After Reading is a lot of fun. It has its flaws, but just like its characters, in the end there is more to laugh about than to be turned off by, and the film is very successful as a satire of American culture and politics.

Good for: Coen Brothers fans, Brad Pitt fans, fans of dark comedies

Bad for: people who like straight-forward comedy, the easily disturbed

The Gallery
The Economist: * * * *
The Surfer: * * * *
The Film Maker: * * * *

Tropic Thunder (2008)

* * * * *

Ben Stiller is one of the funniest, most talented people in Hollywood, but his resume has played out like Ryan Howard's career; a few homeruns and a whole lot of strikeouts. Tropic Thunder, however, is the funniest movie this year among some strong competition, and is a classic that puts Stiller at the top of the comedy scene with the likes of Ferrell and Apatow. Stiller steps behind the camera in Tropic Thunder for the first time since Zoolander, directing an ensemble cast of Robert Downey Jr., Jack Black, Steve Coogan, Danny McBride, and newcomer Brandon T. Jackson. Stiller penned the script with Etan Cohen (not to be confused with Ethan Coen of Coen Bros. fame) about a group of actors who are sent to film a war movie. When the director (Coogan) feels that the project is suffering due to lack of motivation, he strands the troupe in the Vietnamese jungle and the line between acting and reality starts to blur. The film is an amalgam of satire and original storyline, and Stiller mixes in gag humor, witty punchlines, and countless references to past war films. Tropic Thunder is way smarter than Hot Shots but not as topical as Dr. Strangelove, and the result is a movie that is loaded with laughs of all varieties. The cast is incredible, as Stiller, Black, and Downey Jr. form an amazing squad, playing stereotypical actors far from their real-life identity. Stiller is hilarious, as usual, and plays a hothead, doofus action-star somewhat similar to some of his past roles such as White Goodman in Dodgeball (and looks surprisingly jacked). Jack Black turns in one of his best performances as a drug-dependent comedian/actor, and newcomer Brandon T. Jackson manages to hold his own among the stars as Alpa Chino. Its hard to quantify Robert Downey Jr.'s performance, who plays Kirk Lazarus, the only "real actor" of the bunch. Lazarus is so committed to his role that he "becomes" a black man, and like Lazarus who he plays, Downey Jr. is so entrenched in the role it is easy to forget the man is actually white. The performance is instant comedy legend; Downey Jr. is so good that literally every one of his lines is funny, everything he says becomes a joke. Tropic Thunder packs a surprise attack, however, that is outright brilliance; cameos. There are many guest appearances, but there are two major stars playing large roles (unmentioned in the credits and promotion of the movie) that are both lights-out, laugh-out-loud performances. Overall, the film relies much more heavily on strong, intricately detailed comedic performances than profanity and vulgarity, and Tropic Thunder is more of a "film" than most of the funniest comedies from the past few years. There is plenty of profanity and obscene violence to elicit an R rating, but the dirtiness simply complements great acting and writing, instead of replacing it. The film has a cohesive feel that shows that everyone involved embraced the project, and features such as three fake commercials/previews that precede the film are clever and add to the depth of the characters. Stiller's script is the funniest he has ever written, and the story that goes along ties together all of the character's flaws and strengths for a well-rounded, surprisingly compelling plot. The laughs hit hard and often, as Tropic Thunder is a classic war comedy that has more to say about the state of Hollywood than war.

Good for: Stiller fans, war movie fans, anyone with a sense of humor

Bad for: some Will Ferrell fans, the easily offended

The Gallery
The Economist: * * * * *
The Surfer: * * *
The Writer * * * *

Tell No One (2008)

* * * *

Tell No One is the story of a doctor who, while browsing the internet at work, receives a strange e-mail from his wife. The catch; she has been dead for eight years. This simple premise at first glance seems like something that should be destined for a month on the big screen and a quick DVD release. The catch; Tell No One is adapted from an American novel, but is shot entirely in French, in France, and by a young director at the helm of only his second film. Director Guillaume Canet brings a fresh, exciting feel to this suspense thriller without resorting to typical Hollywood cliche. The film stars François Cluzet as Dr. Alex Beck, who was at first accused but eventually cleared of his wife's brutal murder. Eight years later, he is still grieving when he is mysteriously contacted by her. The police decide to reopen the investigation, and in his attempt to decipher if the message was a cruel hoax or a paranormal phenomenon, he becomes a fugitive of the police. There are many strange characters, all of which are portrayed believably by a strong supporting cast. However, the star is Cluzet who is brilliant as Beck, capturing the humanity of a husband who has lost the love of his life and the acumen of a doctor trying to solve a difficult puzzle under intensely odd conditions. Canet challenges the audience just as Beck is challenged in the film, leading the plot down many sudden twists and sharp turns and dropping little clues along the way. At times the film becomes quite confusing and just when things start to come together, another element is thrown in which completely adjusts the viewpoint. Tell No One is a mystery film on the surface, and a great one at that, but a love story at heart. The suspense of the plot is complemented by flashbacks and imagery which give an emotional depth to the events taking place. Canet is clearly influenced by Hitchcock and American suspense films of the past and creates a blanket of tension that hangs over the audience, building heavier and heavier as the film nears its conclusion. When everything starts to come together for real, the depth in the performances and story make the conclusion, which may be the best final scene of the year, that much more rewarding for the viewer. The film is adapted from a book, and there are some illogical circumstances that were likely a result of condensing a novel into just over two hours of film. The reality of the film is at times sacrificed for continuity, and although this definitely detracts from an otherwise effective portrayal of reality, the performances and script are so strong that the inconceivable situations are largely overshadowed. The basic premise seems stale at first glance, but the inner-workings of this story are very well written and original. Tell No One is the rare thriller that holds you to your seat without insulting you with mindless violence, major plot holes left unexplained, or rehashing the same old scenarios. Its a good thing the script made it past Hollywood to France. Like Guillermo del Toro with Pan's Labyrinth and Juan Antonio Bayona with the Orphanage, Canet stays true to the genre while packing so much depth into the characters ad the story. Foreign directors, of late, seem to be much more capable of providing layers of entertainment, so that the film is not merely a thrill ride but a work of art with the potential to be interpreted and enjoyed on many levels. The French perspective keeps the film fresh, and the combination of a sharp, young director and an extremely talented leading man yield a gripping thriller with more to it than what meets the eye.

Good for: fans of foreign films, people who like mysteries and suspense, a date

Bad for: people who cannot read subtitles

Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2008)

* * * *

Leave it to Woody Allen to prove once again what great writing can do to a simple premise. The master of dark humor has returned to familiar territory, framing the curious nature of human relationships within his cynical perspective. At age 71, he is as sharp as ever. Allen employs his most recent muse, Scarlett Johansson, as twenty-something Cristina, who is on a trip to Spain with her girlfriend, Vicky, played by Rebecca Hall. Vicky and Cristina are best friends yet total opposites. Vicky prefers men on the path to fortune and serious relationships, whereas Cristina yearns for whimsical flings with artists and thinkers. They just so happen to encounter an artist at dinner, Juan Antonio, played by Javier Bardem. The bizarre love triangle which ensues involves sight-seeing through Barcelona, a lot of wine, and the emergence of Maria Elena, played by Penelope Cruz. Bardem is every bit as smooth as his character Anton Chigurh in No Country for Old Men was haunting, and is great to watch in an excellent role to follow up his Oscar winning performance. Johansson is mediocre for the most part, and aside from Lost in Translation, has yet to show great skill or just what Allen sees in her. She and Hall both have bright spots within their performances, but fade in the presence of Bardem and Cruz. Although neither of their characters names appear in the title, Bardem and Cruz are the stars of the show and are thunder and lightning when on screen together. They are sexy, combustible, and truly enact the passion that has come to be associated with the Hispanic lifestyle. Cruz is on fire in one her best roles. Maria Elena is a beautiful inferno seemingly unable to control her emotions or tact. Cruz has quietly built an impressive resume in good films, and may be the most underrated actress in the business. Allen compliments the beauty of his cast by capturing the beauty of Barcelona with landscape shots and locations ranging from fine restaurants and museums to small villages and trees under the moon. The film is one of the sexiest of the past few years, but shows very little and leaves much to the imagination. A particularly evocative scene involving Cruz and Johansson in a dark room, however, is likely to be one of the film's most memorable. Like all of Allen's films, he touches on the intricacies and oddities of love, placing his characters in situations everyone can relate to and having them ask themselves questions that we have all considered, although not for sixty years like Allen has. The humor is sharp but not obvious, hitting the nail on the head for some and flying over the head for others. But for those that get it, they will be laughing hard, on the inside. Woody Allen is the dean of the romantic comedy and brings legitimacy to an otherwise atrocious genre. Once again, he shows exactly how it is supposed to be done with a spicy, intelligent film.

Good for: Allen fans, people who like romantic comedies, fans of dark humor, art film fans

Bad for: people who liked 50 First Dates

Pineapple Express (2008)

* * * *

Stoners rejoice: the stoner film genre has made a triumphant return with Pineapple Express, the brainchild of Superbad writers Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg. The central theme of Pineapple Express is, of course, marijuana, but unlike many recent so-called weed movies, the underlying premise and surprisingly detailed plot make the film enjoyable for all audiences. Starring Rogen and James Franco as a customer (Dale Denton) and drug dealer (Saul Silver), respectively, the film follows the two as they try to escape from a drug dealer who Denton witnessed committing murder. When Denton scrambles to escape from the murder scene, he drops a joint containing the potent marijuana strain Pineapple Express, which Ted Jones, the murderer, finds and tracks to Saul Silver. Chaos ensues as the two full-fledged stoners both light up joints and car tires in an attempt to not get whacked. Rogen proves yet again that he belongs in center stage, and despite his chubby, goofy appearance, he can carry a comedy on his broad shoulders. Franco, known by many more for his looks than talent, truly avoids type-casting by playing a lazy pot dealer, a character even more stoned than Rogen. Together, they make a legendary tag-team that will go down in stoner lore. Pineapple Express follows in the footsteps of other Judd Apatow classics by complementing a great premise and hilarious leads with an extremely talented supporting cast. Rosie Perez, who seemingly disappeared after White Men Can't Jump, returns as a crooked cop with a knack for violence in what may be the best role of her career. Gary Cole, like his role as Lumbergh in Office Space, brings a twisted element to Ted Jones which works wonders when he is on the screen with Perez. And Danny McBride, as Red, turns in the most notable supporting performance as he has some of the film's most memorable lines and is nearly killed time and time again. Apatow recruited little known David Gordon Green to direct, and Green delivers a sharp, stylish film that stays true to a brilliantly written script. Rogen and Goldberg crafted plenty of jokes and dialogue that will resonate with the stoner culture, and there are plenty of bizarre situations characteristic of Apatow films (Denton's high school girlfriend), but what separates Pineapple Express from Dude, Where's My Car and Half Baked is the legitimate crime/thriller storyline. Many will be surprised by how well the action scenes are executed, with shrewd detail such as characters firing guns as if they never have touched one before. And even the most toasted in the audience will snap out of their daze when they see the surprising level of violence and gore. The soundtrack frames each scene perfectly, and a black-and-white prologue featuring Bill Hader sets the tone for the film. There are definitely jokes that will go over some of the audience's head, and some dialogue is so dumbed down for those who have lost some brain cells to the wacky weed that those who abstain may not be impressed, but there is enough intelligence and creativity here to prevent any comparisons to How High. Pineapple Express is clearly a descendant of the Cheech and Chong lineage of buddy capers and marijuana glorification, but the film clearly shows inheritance from Tarantino as well, and its authenticity and originality has re-lit the cherry of the stoner film.

Good for: potheads, Apatow fans

Bad for: straight-edgers

The Gallery
The Economist: * * * *
The Surfer: * * *
The Film Maker: * * * *
The Writer * * * * *

Step Brothers (2008)

* * * *

Another summer, and the Judd Apatow train keeps on chugging. The Apatow posse has grown larger and larger with each subsequent hit film, but with Step Brothers, he brings out his top guns Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly, and pairs them with one of his best directors, Adam McKay (Talladega Nights, The Landlord). This deadly comedic combination could make laughs out of seemingly any premise, and Step Brothers is more of a testament to that statement than one could imagine. Ferrell and Reilly play 40+ year old men still living with and mooching from their mom and dad, respectively. When the mother and father, played by Mary Steenburgen and Richard Jenkins (The Visitor), fall in love and get married, Brennan (Ferrell) and Dale (Reilly) become Step Brothers and move into the same house. And really, thats all there is to the film. The premise itself is just an excuse to get Reilly and Ferrell on the screen at the same time. For nearly anyone else this would be a cop-out and a flop, but for this, its a riot. Both actors are at the top of their game, delivering their immature, profane, and offensive humor in large, near-constant doses. Despite starring in Walk Hard, the under-appreciated Reilly still seems to be flying under the radar. But make no mistake, he is every bit as funny as Ferrell in this film, holding his own and sometimes even outshining him. Most often, though, the two complement each other near perfectly, making a powerful comedy tag-team. There is plenty of gross-out physical humor, and brilliantly vulgar lines that will defy the imagination of even the most raunchy minds. After wading in PG-13 territory for a few films, its nice to see Ferrell return to the land of the F-Bomb, and Reilly picks up right where he left off with Dewey Cox. Although Jenkins and Steenburgen provide a few laughs as the parents, and a turn by Adam Scott as Brennan's younger, more successful, completely over the top brother sets up Ferrell for some great scenes, the film almost comes across as a two-man comedy hour that just happens to have some other actors around to take up space. The story, for the most part, is completely typical, and because of the abundance of laugh-out-loud humor, it doesn't really matter. For the same reason though, those who don't have a taste for Ferrell's adult humor will have almost nothing left to enjoy. This isn't a great film in the sense of modern cinema, and its not meant to be. The bulk of the intelligence on-hand is the bizarre creativity required to write and recite uniquely vulgar lines, vulgarity no 14 year old or frat boy has yet dreamed of. This also isn't Apatow or Ferrell's finest moment, but Step Brothers may just go down as the cult-classic of the Apatow collection. The storyline isn't nearly as original or clever as the 40 Year Old Virgin, Anchorman, or Talladega Nights, but there are just as many memorable quotes as a 2-hour stand-up comedy special, which is what Step Brothers essentially is.

Good for: Apatow fans, Ferrell fans, immature people

Bad for: serious people, deep thinkers

The Gallery
The Surfer: * * * *
The Film Maker: * * *
The Writer * * * *

The Dark Knight (2008)

* * * * *

An unprecedented amount of hype surrounded the Dark Knight, and the aggressive marketing campaign, viral internet buildup, and mythic nature of Heath Ledger's final performance put the film in prime position to disappoint. The expectations were unheard of, yet, riding on Ledger's remarkable performance, Christopher Nolan's epic vision, and an inspired cast and crew, the Dark Knight beat the odds to meet and perhaps even exceed the cinematic and box office anticipation. The Dark Knight is to superhero films what the Godfather is to mob films, Apocalypse Now to war films, Scarface to mob films and Star Wars to science fiction. There are other great films in this genre, but the Dark Knight is the best, and the bar has clearly been raised. The story picks up where Batman Begins left off, with Gotham City in turmoil and Batman doing his part to restore justice to the city. Word comes along of a new powerful player in the crime scene who is getting under the skin of both the law enforcement and rival mobs, and goes by the name of the Joker. The ensuing battle between Batman, the Joker, and district attorney Harvey Dent involve sly backhanded negotiations, gripping fight and chase scenes, heists, twists, turns and more. Nolan deserves tremendous credit for writing an engaging plot that is sharp and fast despite running at two and a half hours, for capturing all of the performers at the best of their ability, and for framing the story within the beautiful Gothic imagery of Gotham City. The film was shot largely with cameras suited for IMAX, and although any big screen will do the film justice, the IMAX experience is one in itself. Christian Bale once again delivers a standout performance as Batman and Bruce Wayne, with the Wayne persona becoming a bit darker and more sadistic, channeling aspects of Bale's performance as Patrick Bateman in American Psycho. Aaron Eckhart, the wild card of the film, is excellent as Dent, embodying the public servant's noble and devious sides very believably. The supporting cast remains largely the same, except for a moderate improvement with Maggie Gyllenhaal replacing Katie Holmes as Rachel, and once again Freeman, Caine, and Oldman are spot-on. The film, of course, belongs to the late Heath Ledger. The maniacal and eccentric, yet painstakingly nuanced performance will go down as one of the best villains ever captured on film, haunting, and chill-inducing at times. The Joker has never been more entertaining, demented, but most of all, realistic. The Joker (or any of the characters) is no longer a cartoon character or a silly bad-guy with a big grin, but a twisted individual with a history and a reason for his insanity. The Dark Knight follows Batman Begins in that the tradition of hero versus bad-guy for its own sake is thrown out the window, and the reasons behind each character's motivations is explained to bring depth to the roles and circumstances. The performances and script aren't meant to be a thrill-ride; these characters and stories, like Batman Begins, pay homage to the original comic book writers intent of using fantasy as an allegory for the issues and circumstances the modern world faces. The film is loaded with symbolic imagery, and religious, governmental, and moral motifs. The attention to detail is remarkable, and the depth to which the Dark Knight can be dissected will thrill diehard comic book fans while drawing in many casual fans as well. There are times where the Dark Knight loses some of the ultra-realistic sense that dominated Batman Begins, leaning more toward traditional super hero movie action, but the powerful and unique performances and story seem to overshadow the film's flaws. The Dark Knight will have its place in history and pop culture for its box office successes and the media hype machine that surrounded it, but movie fans will remember it as the best of its kind, a film loaded with actors at their strongest, a writer/director capable of bringing an unforgettable vision to the screen, and a highly entertaining, yet entirely thought provoking film.

Good for: movie fans of all kinds, Batman fans, Ledger fans, Bale fans

Bad for: those who don't like long movies, people who automatically dislike popular films

The Gallery
The Economist: * * * * *
The Surfer: * * * *
The Film Maker: * * * *
The Writer * * * *

Wanted (2008)

* *

Wanted does exactly what it was set out to do; that being to appease the appetite of the mindless summer movie watcher with guns, girls, and gore. This film is the very definition of a Hollywood action movie and boasts all the necessary ingredients including dazzling fight sequences, stunning CGI, a mind-bending plot, and Angelina Jolie. To top it all off, the writers try to add layers upon layers of depth and allusions to societal pressures to fit in, be successful, and do the right thing, a message that resonates perfectly with the target audience. James McAvoy (Atonement) stars as Wesley Gibson, a down-and-out office worker frustrated with the repetition and monotony of his everyday life. When he finds out his dad, who has been missing since the day he was born, was a deadly, superhuman assassin, he realizes his destiny to become a member of "The Fraternity" and follow in his father's footsteps, avenging his death. Morgan Freeman plays Sloan, the leader of the Fraternity, in a performance that could literally be exactly the same as at least five other Freeman roles in the past decade. Jolie as Fox and Common as Gunsmith are members of the Fraternity and help train Wesley to attain his supernatural assasin abilities. Wanted may be one of the most cliched movies of all time, and is essentially the textbook example of an action movie. There are so many elements contrived from other films its difficult to keep count by the time the credits roll. Some scenes are so generic they become painful to watch, while others are so fast-paced, visually impressive, or downright hot (Jolie) that you can't take your eyes off the screen. The last twenty minutes involve so many plot twists that they seem to happen just for the sake of throwing the audience off the right path. The nerdy action lover who can recite lines from the Matrix series will probably follow along and find genius within the writers efforts to make a statement about taking control of your life and creating your own destiny. The rest of us won't understand what happened or why and won't care enough to figure it out either. Wanted is pure sleaze and proud of it, and people will either love or hate it for exactly that reason.

Good for: action fans, drunk people, someone not in the mood to think, Jolie fans

Bad for: artists, people bothered by violence

Get Smart (2008)

* * *

For the casual movie fan looking for a mindless summer diversion, Get Smart fires on all cylinders. Equal parts action and humor, the big screen adaptation pretty much picks up right in it's predecessor's footsteps. Starring Steve Carell, Get Smart starts before Maxwell Smart is promoted from analyst to special agent and details his first mission alongside Agent 99, played by Anne Hathaway. Carell essentially carries the movie on his shoulders and proves once again how extremely talented and versatile he is. Ten years ago, when this film was first pitched to studios, Jim Carrey was slotted to play the lead role, but Carell saves this questionable idea from being another pointless summer bust. The supporting cast was well chosen, including Alan Arkin as the Chief, James Caan as the president, and a cameo by Bill Murray. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson stands out as Agent 23 in what is easily his funniest and most natural performance to date. The usually spot-on David Koechner, however, delivers a forced performance that seems too similar to his characters in Anchorman and the Office. The screen writing duo behind Get Smart are veteran TV writers and it shows as the film feels like a two hour prologue to the series. The humor is absurd but sharp, and some jokes will undoubtedly fly way over the target audience's head. There are some surprisingly raunchy jokes that will make even the most stubborn comedy fan laugh, but there are also too many lines that are completely predictable and sound like they were taken from a children's joke book. The action is up to modern standards, will impress action aficionados, and is far more over-the-top than anything ever seen in the series. Director Peter Segal has stood behind plenty of duds including Anger Management, 50 First Dates, The Longest Yard, and the last of the Naked Gun series, but also directed the gem Tommy Boy. Get Smart falls somewhere in the middle, a bit closer to Tommy Boy. Segal rode Chris Farley to huge success, and will likely ride Carell into a big payday with the fun and funny Get Smart.

Good for: fans of the original series, Carell fans, casual movie fans

Bad for: people looking to think, uptight people

Wall-E (2008)

* * * * *

Part of the magic of movies is the feeling you get when the credits roll and you know you've just participated in artistic brilliance. Pixar has become accustomed to providing movie-goers with this experience, but never more so than with their latest creation, Wall-E. The story of a robot on an Earth displaced from human habitation for 700 years and his space-journey to find love stands head and shoulders above Pixar's recent successes and everything else released this year. In fact, Wall-E isn't to be compared with this years films, but stands tall among the film classics of all-time. Wall-E is like a five-tool baseball player, strong in every possible aspect and nearly flawless in some. The combination of impeccable visuals and sound transplants the viewer into a futuristic world from the very first minute. The attention to detail by the creators, including writer/director Andrew Stanton (Finding Nemo), is astounding. Film references, deep symbolism, and clever observations abound throughout the entire 98 minutes, and, like usual, the Pixar visual team has created stunning animation to accompany a rock-solid script. The first 45 minutes of the film is the most phenomenal and unique sequence to appear on the big screen in years. Nearly dialogue-free, the lens follows Wall-E as we come to understand his existence on a barren, trash-filled Earth and his programmed, artificial-intelligence version of a personality. The creative minds behind Wall-E took unbelievable chances, and their fearless vision pays off time and again. The film begins to become more conventional, but no less stunning, when humans are first introduced to the story. The story that follows leaves the viewer rooting for not only Wall-E, but the entire human race. Stanton loaded Wall-E with metaphor and allusions concerning mankind and the future, but nothing is forced and every jab of wit, sarcasm, and innuendo fit perfectly into place. Ultimately, Wall-E is a film about love and companionship, and using robots as a vehicle to portray this drives home the universal nature of the subject matter. And that is what Wall-E truly is, universal. Some of the references may go over the head of the kids, but Wall-E has something for everyone to relate to. Wall-E will make you laugh, and think, but more than anything, smile. The climactic scene between Wall-E and Eve is instant film lore, and Wall-E, the robot with more personality than most humans, will be no doubt be mentioned in the same conversations as Forrest Gump, ET, Vito Corleone, Darth Vader, and Hannibal Lecter. Wall-E is the culmination of excellent film making from every imaginable angle and unthinkable creativity.

Good for: everyone, Pixar fans, children, a date, film buffs

Bad for: mean people, uptight people

The Gallery
The Film Maker: * * * *

Flight of the Red Balloon (2008)

* * *

Flight of the Red Balloon is a remake of the 1956 short-film The Red Balloon, directed by Taiwanese director Hsiao-hsien Hou and shot in Paris in French. The story revolves around a young boy, Simon, who continually eyes a red balloon as the everyday chaos of urban life surrounds him. His mother, played by Julitte Binoche, is a stressed out single mother trying to earn a living as a voice over actor for puppet shows while maintaining a somewhat normal family life at home. She loves her son, but has little time to spend with him if she intends to pay the rent, so she hires Song (played by Fang Song), a Taiwanese student, to babysit him. Simon and Song develop a close relationship and share their imagination to pass their time together. Hou's shooting style is very unique, as Flight of the Red Balloon plays out as an extremely slow paced movie, and his choice of a quiet, ambient score suits his camera work well. Individual scenes may last up to five minutes with the shot at the same camera angle, and there are many long, silent shots of Paris, the sky, and the ever-present red balloon. The calm, reflective pace is juxtaposed against the unsteady lifestyle of the characters, and the film is deep in symbolism. As in the original, the balloon represents the innocent spirit of childhood as Simon seems oblivious to the disordered adult-life surrounding him when he has his Playstation, piano, books, and love for his mom to worry about. The cast fit together quite well, and at times appear as if they are a real family, which makes the film successful as a meditation on urban life and unconventional families. The visuals are appealing, and the acting is engaging, but the pace is so slow that some may have trouble maintaining constant attention or even alertness for the entire film. The original short was only 34 minutes, and this remake comes in at under two hours but feels like every bit of 113 minutes. Flight of the Red Balloon is pretty and worthwhile, but material seems stretched. Perhaps Hou should have split the difference between his version and the original at around 80 minutes.

Good for: fans of French films, art film fans, diehard fans of the original

Bad for: easily bored, people who dislike subtitles, tired people

The Visitor (2008)

* * * *

The Visitor is proof that not every movie requires an attractive, A-list leading man or woman to carry the film, and that a career-defining role can come at any age. Richard Jenkins is sixty years old, and although some may recognize him from HBO's Six Feet Under, he has been a character actor playing mostly small roles for over thirty years. In the Visitor he stars as Professor Walter Vale, a quiet widower sent from his teaching-post in Connecticut to a global economics conference in New York City against his will. When he gets to an apartment he has owned but not visited for years he finds two unexpected visitors. Jenkins performance as Vale is so subtle and nuanced that it barely seems like a performance, more like a high school or college teacher most of us have known in the past. At times short tempered, Vale almost only speaks when spoken to and even then responds with only what must be said. The brief introduction to Vale would lead one to believe he would be upset and deeply bothered by the intruders living in the apartment he owns, however, he chooses to let them stay, and the relationship he develops with them reveals who he really is. The visiting couple is played by Haaz Sleiman (Tarek) and Danai Jekesai Gurira (Zainab), both of whom were well casted and are strikingly younger and more vibrant than Jenkins, creating both tension and surprise. Jenkins is in the early running for performance of the year, and Hiam Abbass, as Tarek's mother, is a strangely well-fitting complement to Jenkins in a supporting role. The drama that ensues explores how we approach someone different, dealing with loss and growing old, and the complexity of immigration in post 9/11 America. The script written by Thomas McCarthy is sharp and his direction is to the point for the most part. At times the Visitor becomes a bit too sentimental and predictable, but although you may see what is coming, the deeply human performances illuminate the issues of diversity in American life. Every scene is tightly edited, New York City is captured for its spirit and its gloom, and the film's climax will tug at your heart strings while leaving a sense of hope and life. In under two hours the Visitor packs an emotional punch with a few jabs of humor, all while raising important questions about the state of American politics and culture, a facet of film too often ignored in this year's releases.

Good for: independent film fans, the politically and socially aware

Bad for: fans of box-office blockbusters, intolerant people

The Gallery
The Film Maker: * * * *